In Praise of Zotero: The One Hill I Will Die On in Research Workflow
Why a free, open reference manager is the single tool most likely to save a doctoral project, and what its unpolished interface is quietly buying you.
Why a free, open reference manager is the single tool most likely to save a doctoral project, and what its unpolished interface is quietly buying you.
Anderson and During recast theory as a set of reading practices rather than a doctrine, which turns the ordinary work of sorting a field into an argument you have to defend.
Joseph Jacotot taught French he could not explain, and Jacques Rancière turned the accident into an argument about what every explanation assumes before it begins.
Jürgen Habermas separates practice argued out among practitioners from practice handed down by money or command, and leaves behind a portable audit for telling the two apart.
Giroux moves pedagogy out of the classroom and into film, policy, and platforms, and then the question becomes which institution teaches your field its common sense.
Theory is never the destination for a scholar-practitioner; the rhythm is praxis, theory, praxis, and the test at the end is the question a friend asks over coffee.
Three lenses on innovation (diffusion, encoding, leading change), one philosophical move underneath them, and two tests any proposal has to survive.
A walk through the Frankfurt School’s claim that thinking becomes critique only when it accounts for its own historical situation, institutions, and consequences.
How to end a piece of practice-based scholarship: implications that point forward, reflection that grows from the argument instead of decorating it, and an abstract written after everything else.
Kremer and Jackson-Paton’s reflexive method braids autobiography, ethnography, and participatory epistemology into a discipline for naming where you stand when you judge.
How a practice of radical presence became a defensible method: its dimensions, the dissertations that built it, and the point where it meets autoethnography.
How de Kock’s model of integration turns the literature review into a conversation partner and makes the researcher’s own location part of the evidence.